Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

Furthermore, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are certainly not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state might be deemed via the court.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told with the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist certain them that that they had almost nothing to worry about.

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation consists of the names with the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it absolutely was decided, along with the book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that although thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the merit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed because of the respondent department just to extend favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part in the respondent department.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also more info to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Consequently, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, and the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the legislation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases heard during the state court, in the same level.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the acquired counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.